Secondary tabs
Submission information
Submission Number: 238
Submission ID: 297
Submission UUID: dbe5ddd2-e9dd-4254-815c-839c57448319
Submission URI: /form/submit-contribution
Created: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 - 14:59
Completed: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 - 15:19
Changed: Wed, 13 May 2026 - 08:31
Remote IP address: 86.49.224.10
Submitted by: Richie Lux Kramár
Language: English
Is draft: No
Current page: webform_confirmation
Flagged: Yes
| Given name | Richie Lux |
|---|---|
| Surname | Kramár |
| p.korepetitorka@gmail.com | |
| I understand that by submitting this form, I consent to the use of my data for the purposes of the 2026 Forum on Artistic Research'. | Yes |
| I agree to the terms of service. | Yes |
| Title | The Prompter: Discord, Care, and Cues for Survival |
| Format | Other format |
| Main language | English |
| Abstract | In the opera house, the prompter works as a vocal prosthesis, a disembodied voice dedicated to filling gaps when the operatic machine falters. This figure lives in perpetual readiness to serve yet is structurally excluded from authorship and public history. This research identifies a parallel between the prompter and the trans subject through their shared navigation of the gap between body and voice. While this discord, an asymmetrical or desynchronized relationship between how one sounds and how one is seen, is a site of safety and an official function for the prompter, it remains a site of high-stakes danger and political endangerment for the trans subject. This lecture performance explores how the prompter’s labor can be reclaimed as a survival strategy. It moves away from the institutional demand to save or document the trans voice, proposing a methodology of cruising instead. Much like the silent high-stakes codes of cruising, prompting is a private linguistic exchange, a shorthand of whispered cues and cryptic marks on a score intended for an audience of one. By treating the vocal score not as fixed but as a site for unauthorized intimate connection, the work explores the pleasure a trans subject derives from a voice that refuses to appear for the general public. The performance enacts this discord as a tactile labor of care. The presentation is intentionally non-frontal and desynchronized, creating a tension that requires the audience to proactively activate the material. Through live vocalization and opaque video traces that maintain a specific gaze without offering full disclosure, the work invites a process of participatory sense-making. Rather than a smooth delivery of results, the performance functions as an open rehearsal, a space where the trans subject and the prompter become co-conspirators in a practice of resistance against narrative standardization. |
| Image |
|
| Short biographies of the presenter(s) |
|
| Previous presentations or iterations of the research | This lecture performance stems from the doctoral research project THE MONSTER SINGS (JAMU). Elements of this research have been peer-reviewed and presented in the following contexts: Peer-reviewed Journals: "Mouthing into the void: Can the prompter sing?" (JIVS, 2026); "I Love Listening to Music and Imagining Things Happening" (VIS, 2025). Conference Presentations (2025): PARSE (Gothenburg); Teritoria umění (Prague); Dance Resonance (Vienna); The Culture of Attractions (Torun); IFTR (Cologne). |
| Additional information | This 20-minute lecture performance functions as a situated rehearsal, rejecting a directive or smooth style in favor of a fragmented, haptic engagement. The performance centers on the figure of the prompter, focusing on the physical strain of throwing a voice that belongs to an other. This is mirrored in the text: an unfaithful reconstruction of operatic fragments and personal reflections that leak, emphasizing the inherent relationality of language and the fact that we always receive our words from someone else. The accompanying media, video projections serving as opaque traces, offer a gaze that is both seductive and non-coercive. By creating a space of partial invisibility, the format allows the audience to determine their own degree of participation. Ultimately, it is a transmission that values the interval, the echo, and the unfaithful memory over the standardized institutional record. |
| Spatial and technical requirements | AV: Projector and screen; stereo audio output for a laptop. Furniture: One music stand or small table, chair. Lighting: The ability to dim lights is appreciated but not necessary. Space: A setup that allows for a non-frontal relationship with the audience is appreciated but not necessary. |
| Potential risks or ethical concerns | The performance involves live vocalization and themes related to trans identity. There are no physical risks to the audience. Practically, the research uses opacity as a framework to ensure that personal or community-specific data is not made public, protecting the anonymity of sources. All archival operatic materials are used under fair use for artistic research. Audience participation is voluntary; the non-frontal setup allows attendees to choose their own level of proximity and engagement. |
| Create a user account for SAR 2026 | Yes |
| Create new user | Richie Lux Kramár |